BAGAIMANA DENGAN KITA YANG DIJANJIKAN KEMENANGAN ITU…???!!!
Lord Curzon, who was the British Foreign Secretary back in 1924. After the termination of Khilafat, the secretary expressed his views, in the following words: “The point at issue is that Turkey has been destroyed and shall never rise again, because we have destroyed her spiritual power: the Caliphate and Islam.”
In the Economist Magazine issue of 1996, it was predicted, that in the 21st century, their will be two emerging economies, One will be that of China , and the other will be Caliphate.
He said: “…what we call terrorism in the United States , but which is really the uprising of radical Islam against the secular world, and against the democratic world, on behalf of re-establishing a sort of Caliphate.”
A report by of the CIA predicted that by 2020 a “New Caliphate” would have been established. This 123-page report titled “Mapping the Global Future” was aimed to prepare the next Bush administration for future challenges, and was presented to US President, members of Congress, cabinet members and key officials involved in policymaking.
On 5th October, 2005, British Home Secretary, Charles Clarke delivered a speech on Counter Terrorism at The Heritage Foundation (a neoconservative think tank, Washington DC ), in which he stated: “What drives these people on is ideas. And unlike the liberation movements of the post World War II era in many parts of the world, these are not in pursuit of political ideas like national independence from colonial rule, or equality for all citizens without regard for race or creed, or freedom of expression without totalitarian repression. Such ambitions are, at least in principle, negotiable and in many cases have actually been negotiated. However there can be no negotiation about the re-creation of the Caliphate; \there can be no negotiation about the imposition of Shariah law; there can be no negotiation about the suppression of equality between the sexes; there can be no negotiation about the ending of free speech. These values are fundamental to our civilization and are simply not up for negotiation.”
“Apa yang mendorong orang-orang itu adalah ide-ide. Dan berbeda dengan gerakan kebebasan di era pasca Perang Dunia II di banyak belahan dunia, ide-ide itu bukanlah untuk menggapai ide-ide politik seperti kemerdekaan nasional dari penjajahan, atau persamaan bagi semua penduduk tanpa membedakan suku dan keyakinan, atau kebebasan berekspresi tanpa tekanan totaliter. Ambisi-ambisi itu adalah, paling tidak secara prinsip, bisa dirundingkan dan dalam banyak hal telah dimusyawarahkan. Namun, tidak ada perundingan bagi pendirian kembali Khilafah; tidak ada perundingan bagi penerapan Hukum Syariah; dan tidak ada perundingan tentang penindasan atas persamaan antara laki-laki dan perempuan; tidak ada perundingan untuk mengakhiri kebebasan berbicara. Nilai-nilai itu adalah sangat fundamental bagi peradaban kami dan tidak dimungkinkan adanya perundingan.”